Abstract
In this paper I have attempted to explore the rising issue of concealed digital contracts and the meaning of user approval in this age of Click to Agree. With the advent of the popularity of standard-form online contracts there is a wide use of standard-form online agreements like clickwrap and browsewrap and the study examines whether this type of contract is a matter of free informed consent or a misuse of user behavior and interface design. The proposed study is quantitative and cross-sectional survey-based and intended to ensure that the internet users of different demographics are circulated to determine the extent to which they are aware of, practice, and perceive the terms and conditions of digital environments. The results indicate that there is a vast percentage of people who accept terms online without reading them and in most cases, find some curb stones or bindings later. Rather surprisingly, even with knowledge of manipulative design patterns, users will agree to things because of habit or need. The comparative legal analysis of differences in the regulatory approaches in European Union, the United States and emerging economies is also provided in the paper. The author of the research concludes that digital contracting is based on pseudo-consent and it does not comply with the basic principles of fairness and transparency. It demands a wholesome change in the consumer protection law, a better design of user interfaces, and people education. Applying an analytical approach to legal, behavioural economics and empirical field, the research injects into the current debate around digital rights and online consent validity.
References
Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F. and Trossen, D.R. (2014). Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts. The Journal of Legal Studies, 43(1), pp.1–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/674424.
European Union (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). [online] Europa.eu. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Kamarinou, D., Millard, C. and Singh, J. (2016). Machine Learning with Personal Data. [online] papers.ssrn.com. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2865811 [Accessed 22 Mar. 2023].
Review, S.L. (2014). Stanford Law Review. [online] Stanford Law Review. Available at: https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/the-no-reading-problem/ [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Statista (2025). Global Retail e-commerce Market Size 2014-2027. [online] Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/ [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Kim, N. S. (2013). Wrap Contracts: Foundations and Ramifications. Oxford University Press. [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Radin, M. J. (2014). Boilerplate: The Fine Print, Vanishing Rights, and the Rule of Law. Princeton University Press. [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2d Cir. 2002). [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc., 763 F.3d 1171 (9th Cir. 2014). [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. PublicAffairs. [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Bakos, Y., Marotta-Wurgler, F. and Trossen, D.R. (2014). Does Anyone Read the Fine Print? Consumer Attention to Standard-Form Contracts. The Journal of Legal Studies, 43(1), pp.1–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/674424.
European Union (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). [online] Europa.eu. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Kamarinou, D., Millard, C. and Singh, J. (2016). Machine Learning with Personal Data. [online] papers.ssrn.com. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2865811 [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Review, S.L. (2014). Stanford Law Review. [online] Stanford Law Review. Available at: https://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/the-no-reading-problem/ [Accessed 20 Jun. 2025].
Becher, S. I., & Benoliel, U. (2019). The Duty to Read the Unreadable. Boston College Law Review, 60(2), 225–278.
Boritz, J. E., & Han, J. C. (2021). Redesigning Consumer Consent for the Digital Economy. Journal of Information Systems, 35(3), 63–88.
Degeling, M. et al. (2018). We Value Your Privacy... Now Take Some Cookies. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, 2018(4), 70–88.
Doneda, D. & Almeida, V. (2016). Brazil's New Internet Civil Framework. IEEE Internet Computing, 20(2), 80–85.
Gray, C. M., Kou, Y., Battles, B., Hoggatt, J., & Toombs, A. (2021). The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. CHI Conference Proceedings.
Hillman, R. A. & Rachlinski, J. J. (2002). Standard-Form Contracting in the Electronic Age. New York University Law Review, 77(2), 429–495.
Hoofnagle, C. J., Urban, J. M., & Li, S. (2019). Privacy and Modern Data Protection Law. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(2), 447–492.
Horton, D. (2017). The Shadow Terms: Contract Procedure and Unilateral Amendments. UCLA Law Review, 64, 1–50.
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2025 Munisa Raimova, Sarvarjon Obidov (Author)
